The Record Problem in Family Law
Cryptocurrency and digital asset holdings frequently surface during divorce proceedings. One or both parties may produce exchange statements, wallet screenshots, transaction histories, or account summaries — often in conflicting formats, covering inconsistent date ranges, and with no standardized organization.
Without a structured evaluation, counsel cannot reliably determine what the records support, where they conflict, or what remains unproduced. Discovery disputes escalate, disclosure timelines extend, and settlement positions lack a documented foundation.
What VARfacts Delivers
Structured Evaluation
The produced record set is organized, indexed, and evaluated under the VAR Framework.
Conflict Identification
Discrepancies between produced records are documented with source citations.
Gap Analysis
Missing records, unproduced periods, and incomplete account coverage are identified.
Verification Status
Each claim is classified under the Verification Status Standard based on record support.
Common Scenarios
One party claims cryptocurrency holdings but produced records are incomplete or inconsistent.
Exchange statements cover different date ranges and cannot be cross-referenced without structured review.
Wallet addresses are asserted but no produced documentation links them to a named party.
Discovery responses include screenshots or partial exports with no source verification.
Contact Us
If you are managing a family law matter involving digital asset records, contact VARfacts to discuss the record set and scope of evaluation.